Fear, Inc.: America’s Islamophobia Network

Here’s an expose on Islamophobia from August 2011.

 

“At this time last year, as the ninth anniversary of the September 11 attacks approached, the country was gripped by a pernicious debate over a “mosque” (really, an Islamic cultural center) near Ground Zero in New York City.

Pushback against the project actually began months earlier and was led by a group called Stop Islamization of America, which launched “Campaign Offensive: Stop the 911 Mosque!” in May 2010. The group’s founder, Pamela Geller, charged that “this is Islamic domination and expansionism. The location is no accident. Just as Al-Aqsa was built on top of the Temple in Jerusalem.” The group’s co-director, Robert Spencer, helped Geller organize rallies and protest campaigns aimed at a lower Manhattan community board, which reported getting “hundreds and hundreds” of calls and e-mails from around the world as a result of the well-funded and highly coordinated campaign.

Geller and Spencer’s cause was loudly trumpeted by large right-wing media outlets, notably the New York Post and Fox News Channel, both News Corp. properties. The religious right quickly joined; Dr. Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention called the project “unacceptable” because “the people who perpetrated the 9/11 attack were Muslims and proclaimed they were doing what they were doing in the name of Islam.” Soon, politicians were also on board: Newt Gingrich denounced the proposal and argued that although the cultural center was seemingly benign, “some radical Islamists use terrorism as a tactic to impose sharia, but others use nonviolent methods—a cultural, political, and legal jihad that seeks the same totalitarian goal even while claiming to repudiate violence.”

By late summer, as September 11 approached, the “debate” had gone completely mainstream—Geller was invited to appear on CNN, and President Obama was forced to take a position. (Actually, two positions: he voiced support for the project before walking it halfway back).

At one point in August, more than two-thirds of Americans opposed the project. It was a stunning victory for Geller, Spencer, and the xenophobic right, but also an excellent case study of how they operate. According to a comprehensive new report by the Center for American Progress, anti-Islam efforts like this are no vast right-wing conspiracy: rather, it’s a “rather small, tightly networked group of misinformation experts,” operating on $40 million in funding from just seven organizations.

The report, titled “Fear, Inc.,” names five “experts” who generate a huge amount of misinformation about Islam. They are:
   • Frank Gaffney at the Center for Security Policy
   • David Yerushalmi at the Society of Americans for National Existence
   • Daniel Pipes at the Middle East Forum
   • Spencer, of Jihad Watch and Stop Islamization of America
   • Steven Emerson of the Investigative Project on Terrorism

Meanwhile, seven foundations have donated no less than $40 million to Islamophobic think tanks like these over the past ten years. They are:
   • Donors Capital Fund
   • Richard Mellon Scaife foundations
   • Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation
   • Newton D. & Rochelle F. Becker foundations and charitable trust
   • Russell Berrie Foundation
   • Anchorage Charitable Fund and William Rosenwald Family Fund
   • Fairbrook Foundation

In extensive detail, the report describes how this small group of donors fund a cluster of think tanks that promote rank Islamophobia, and how their misinformation is spread through a network of conservative media and grassroots organizers like Geller. The important context here is that anti-Islam sentiment is growing in the decade since the September 11 attacks: an ABC News taken last year in the wake of the Ground Zero mosque debate showed 49 percent of Americans had a negative view of Islam, compared with just 39 percent in October 2002.

The biggest contributor to these efforts, by far, is the Donors Capital Fund, which has given over $20.7 million to groups like Emerson’s Investigative Project on Terrorism and the Clarion Fund—in fact, Donors Capital Fund fully funded the Clarion Fund’s distribution of the DVD “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West,” which went to over 28 million swing-state voters before the 2008 presidential election.

Donors Capital Fund is a philanthropic organization run by a number of conservative heavyweights. The board includes members of the American Enterprise Institute, the Heritage Foundation and Stephen Moore of the Wall Street Journal.

The report does unearth a few new facts about the Islamophobia network, but many other parts were already known—the New York Times, for example, has already detailed Yerushalmi’s efforts at getting “anti-Shariah” laws passed in statehouses across the country. But the report’s real strength is in demonstrating exactly how small—and effective—this network is.

“It’s not a lot of people, it’s not a lot of organizations, it’s not a lot of money. It is amazing what these people have accomplished,” Eli Clifton, one of the report’s authors, said in a press call Friday.

Faiz Shakir, a vice president at CAP and also a co-author, said the report is “trying to end Islamophobia. If we are to end it we have to identify who are they key motivators and drivers of this hate industry. We have to give a path for those who want to divorce themselves from the Islamophobia industry the opportunity to do so.”

When the report was released on Friday, the targets responded with charaterstic and near-cartoonish zeal; Horowitz said CAP “has joined the Muslim Brotherhood,” and Spencer accused the authors of belonging to the “Islamic supremacist propaganda machine.”

 

http://www.thenation.com/blog/163023/fear-inc-americas-islamophobia-network#

 

For a fuller more in depth report check here [PDF]

 

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/08/pdf/islamophobia.pdf

 

Hat tip to Scot.

Advertisements

9 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

9 responses to “Fear, Inc.: America’s Islamophobia Network

  1. Christopher Proudlove

    For another side to this criticism consult the Act for America website. Trevor Barclay will say it is homophobic but make up your own mind.

  2. Lol. Claims he is not Islamophobic. Cites Act for America.

    ROFLCOPTER

  3. Christopher Proudlove

    Another Trevor Barclay smear.

  4. I think more and more people are starting to see through you, Mr Proudlove.

  5. Christopher Proudlove

    Well, Mr Barclay, would you like to see Sharia law introduced in the UK and the US? You appear to be blind as to what is happening in the world. Millions is being spent in this country on surveillance of jihadists.

  6. Christopher Proudlove

    More censorship. I quit. San Remo has everything to do with the legitimacy of Israel. There is no occupation. Israel has rights granted to it by an irrevocable international treaty. By the way, you have not stated what treaty superseded San Remo nor stated when San Remo became inoperative. Trevor Barclay is a controlling, anti-Semite. This is plain from his reactions and biased comments. He complains of being censored yet unjustly censors comments of those who have an opposing view.

  7. Your above comment proves exactly what i said here,

    https://christiansforzionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/10/03/a-final-warning-to-chris-proudlove/

    Here we have a blog on Islamophobia and you start squealing about San Remo…Are you really that stupid?

    Then you ask this again,

    ” By the way, you have not stated what treaty superseded San Remo nor stated when San Remo became inoperative.”

    I did answer that a couple of days ago but you ignored my reply because you know you have been schooled. Here’s what i said,

    christiansforzionwatch
    October 2, 2013 at 2:02 pm

    “What treaty superseded the 1922 San Remo Treaty giving the right for Israel to settle Jews between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean Sea? When did the San Remo Treaty cease to be operative?”

    I’ve already answered that question but you can’t accept being caught out spreading lies so you ignore it.

    This time i’ll reply by quoting something you posted.

    ” Israel actually has a better claim to its existence, having been created by the U.N. rather than by the whims and national interests of the Allied victors.”

    That’s a quote you posted.

    If you want to reply to this comment i suggest you do so in the relevant blog. Here’s the link

    https://christiansforzionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/israels-real-legitimacy/

    If you post a reply here about San Remo your comment WILL BE DELETED.

    END

    That’s what i replied to your stupid question.

    You are so ignorant that you can’t even agree with yourself as can be noted from the quote i quote you on.

    You then ramble on about me being “Anti Semitic” when in fact ‘Christian Zionists’ are practicing an anti semitism of the most despicable kind in that you wont preach the gospel of Christ crucified to Jews therefore putting their souls at risk for all eternity.

    Also, Zionism, contrary to its claims, does not speak for world Jewry. Zionism is an affront to world Jewry and a cause of anti semitic feeling among a less educated type of people.

    Zionism is no more than a cult of death, theft, lies and ethnic cleansing and you are a part of that, Proudlove.

    You are a liar and all round despicable individual who is no longer welcome here.

    And for any others reading this, if you are a Holocaust denier you are not welcome here.

    If you are a Nakba denier you are not welcome here.

    If you are an Armenian genocide denier you are not welcome here.

    If you support war and violence you are not welcome here.

  8. Christodspher Proudlove

    I’m most certainly not an Armenian genocide denier and neither is Israel. Read “The Happiest People on Earth” by Elizabeth and John Sherill for the background to Turkey’s genocide of Jews and Christians before the country was defeated in the First World War.
    For an answer to Trevor Barclay’s poisonous paragraphs about me look out for my new blog on http://www.christiansforzion.com

  9. “For an answer to Trevor Barclay’s poisonous paragraphs about me…”

    You’ve had plenty of time [and opportunity] to prove me wrong, here, on my blog, but you have failed to do so.

    Why is that, Chris?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s